Abstract
This article explores the complex appeal of home-buying and renovation shows on the cable channel HGTV. While their popularity is clear, their political implications are murkier. Some media studies scholars accuse the genre of fostering consumerism, conformity, and neo-liberal nationhood. Others admire its inclusion and “non-special treatment” of queer and racially diverse participants. My own feminist reading notes the limits as well as merits of the diversity defense and offers to appreciate the shows’ contribution in somewhat different terms. Focusing specifically on House Hunters (1999-present), I credit this home-buying series with asserting the primacy of domestic life in conjunction with a host of related values conventionally coded and subordinated as ‘feminine.’ In the hegemonic scheme of things, qualities coded as ‘masculine’ (the aggressive, historic, large-scale, public-sphere, self-reliant, and individualist) occupy a superior position. House Hunters challenges this gendered hierarchy by reveling in the modest, everyday, small-scale, private-sphere, interdependent, and relational. It does so, moreover, in a gender-neutral way: no longer written off and relegated to women, the little things that happen in houses are made paramount for male and female viewers alike. Adding a further twist, I close with an episode whose homebuyers have histories of social marginality and economic insecurity. In this context, the desire for domestic ‘coziness’ is less about conformity to bourgeois norms and more about feelings of safety and belonging in relation to place.
Work Cited
“Lifestyling Britain: The 8–9 Slot on British Television .” Television after TV: Essays on a Medium in Transition, edited by Lynn Spigel and Jan Olsson Duke UP, 2004, pp. 75–92.An Inside Look at How HGTV Became an Industry Juggernaut.” Architectural Digest, 29 July 2019, architectural-digest.com/story/how-hgtv-became-industry-juggernaut.
“
“Interior Design: Commodifying Self and Place in Extreme Makeover, Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, and The Swan .” The Great American Makeover: Television, History, Nation, edited by Dana Heller Palgrave Macmillan, 2007, pp. 159–73.Trading Private and Public Spaces @HGTV and TLC: On New Genre Formations in Transformation TV.” Journal of Visual Culture, vol. 3, no. 2, 2004, pp. 157–81, doi.org/10.1177/1470412904044798.
“Revolution at Point Zero: Housework, Reproduction, and Feminist Struggle. PM Press, 2012.
Extreme Domesticity: A View from the Margins. Columbia UP, 2017.
Insecure: Narratives and Economies of the Branded Self in Transformation Television.” Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, vol. 22, no. 4, 2008, pp. 495–504, doi.org/10.1080/10304310802189972.
“Heller, Dana, editor. The Great American Makeover: Television, History, Nation. Palgrave Macmillan, 2007.
House Hunters. Created by , Pie Town Productions, 1999-present.
“Life Coaches, Style Mavens, and Design Gurus: Everyday Experts on Reality Television .” A Companion to Reality TV, edited by Laurie Ouellette Wiley Blackwell, 2014, pp. 402–20.Makeover Takeover on British Television.” Screen, vol. 41, no. 3, 2000, pp. 299–314.
“Makeover Television, Governmentality, and the Good Citizen.” Continuum: Journal of Media and Cultural Studies, vol. 22, no. 4, 2008, pp. 471–84. doi.org/10.1080/10304310801982930.
“
“Extreme Makeover: Home Edition: An American Fairy Tale .” Makeover Television: Realities Remodeled, edited byDana Heller .I. B. Tauris , 2007, pp. 165–76.Transformation Scenes: The Television Interior Makeover.” International Journal of Cultural Studies, vol. 8, no. 2, 2005, pp. 213–29, doi.org/10.1177/1367877905052418.
“The Encyclopedia of Trouble and Spaciousness. Trinity UP, 2015.
Makeover TV: Selfhood, Citizenship, and Celebrity. Duke UP, 2009.
Gender Territories: House Hunting on American Real Estate TV.” Television & New Media, vol. 14, no. 3, 2012, pp. 228–43, doi.org/10.1177/1527476412457079.
“
“House Hunters, Real Estate Television, and Everyday Cosmopolitanism .” A Companion to Reality TV, edited by Laurie Ouellette Wiley Blackwell, 2014, pp. 386–401.